From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 8 01:13:09 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32080106566C for ; Tue, 8 Feb 2011 01:13:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dteske@vicor.com) Received: from postoffice.vicor.com (postoffice.vicor.com [69.26.56.53]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17E6C8FC12 for ; Tue, 8 Feb 2011 01:13:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.82.228.121] (port=50984) by postoffice.vicor.com with esmtpsa (SSLv3:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pmc8g-0004ny-Ni; Mon, 07 Feb 2011 17:13:08 -0800 From: Devin Teske To: Eitan Adler In-Reply-To: References: <4D508917.3000202@alokat.org> <1297124530.2564.5.camel@dt.vicor.com> Organization: VICOR, Inc. Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2011 17:13:07 -0800 Message-ID: <1297127587.2564.8.camel@dt.vicor.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.1 X-Scan-Signature: 070ad4a06cbcf57376ca67789415d671 X-Scan-Host: postoffice.vicor.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="cp1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Alokat , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: shutdown computer after the halt command X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2011 01:13:09 -0000 On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 19:26 -0500, Eitan Adler wrote: > >> if I use the *halt* command I just see "the system is halted press any > >> key to reboot" > >> How can I fix this? > > shutdown -p now > don't use halt directly > There's no technical reason to avoid using halt directly other than the fact that shutdown sends a message to connected users while halt does not. -- Devin P.S. I welcome the rebuttle as a learning experience if the above is not 100% accurate and true (but be-warned... I went around the office polling _really_ old UNIX hands before making the above statement).