From owner-cvs-all Sat Dec 22 22:49:43 2001 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from apollo.backplane.com (apollo.backplane.com [216.240.41.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA9FF37B405; Sat, 22 Dec 2001 22:49:40 -0800 (PST) Received: (from dillon@localhost) by apollo.backplane.com (8.11.6/8.9.1) id fBN6nd700617; Sat, 22 Dec 2001 22:49:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dillon) Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2001 22:49:39 -0800 (PST) From: Matthew Dillon Message-Id: <200112230649.fBN6nd700617@apollo.backplane.com> To: "M. Warner Losh" Cc: silby@silby.com, bde@zeta.org.au, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/dev/sio sio.c References: <200112230252.fBN2qVm99224@apollo.backplane.com> <20011222.233810.68955291.imp@village.org> Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG And let me put this another way as well. Who's been maintaining the VM system since Dyson left? ME. So I go and I formally make myself the MAINTAINER of the VM system, now nobody is allowed to commit to the VM system without my permission? That nobody can even *complain* to core because core won't accept their claim unless the MAINTAINER (i.e. me) agrees? Is that what you are saying? That core has no interest in overriding any MAINTAINER? Or is just BDE you have no interest in applying the rules to? How is core supposed to function if it does not apply itself in an even-handed fashion but instead operates as an old-boy's club? -Matt To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message