From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Jun 4 7:45:41 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from jaguar.ir.miami.edu (jaguar.ir.miami.edu [129.171.32.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 038A937B401 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2001 07:45:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcus@miami.edu) Received: from jaguar.ir.miami.edu (jaguar.ir.miami.edu [129.171.32.10]) by jaguar.ir.miami.edu (PMDF V6.0-24 #45575) with ESMTP id <0GEE009EFUC18U@jaguar.ir.miami.edu> for ports@freebsd.org; Mon, 04 Jun 2001 10:45:37 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2001 10:45:37 -0400 (EDT) From: Joe Clarke Subject: Re: OpenSSH In-reply-to: <20010604075123.A56758@leviathan.inethouston.net> X-X-Sender: To: "David W . Chapman Jr ." Cc: Peter Pentchev , Johan Ankarloo , ports@freebsd.org Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Both versions of there now. security/openssh is 2.2.0 while security/openssh-portable is 2.9p1. Is this what you're referring to? Joe Clarke On Mon, 4 Jun 2001, David W . Chapman Jr . wrote: > > It's currently not maintained, but there are two people discussing > > an update to 2.9. When they come to a decision, I guess one of > > them will also want to take up maintainership :) > > > The current proposal is to be to have both version of the port in the tree. My patch is awaiting a repo copy which isn't likely to happen soon. Dirk's version is waiting on testers to make sure it works correctly. > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message