From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 30 11:32:04 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05EEC16A4CE for ; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 11:32:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.panix.com (mail1.panix.com [166.84.1.72]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A07743D70 for ; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 11:32:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from stanb@panix.com) Received: from panix.com (brillig.panix.com [166.84.1.76]) by mail1.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEE0D48D11; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 14:32:00 -0500 (EST) Received: from teddy.fas.com (pcp01010374pcs.mplsnt01.sc.comcast.net [68.58.176.69]) by panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C4DC2AA0E; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 14:31:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from stan by teddy.fas.com with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1AmeMt-0007IH-00; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 14:31:55 -0500 Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 14:31:55 -0500 From: stan To: Edmund Craske Message-ID: <20040130193155.GA27927@teddy.fas.com> Mail-Followup-To: Edmund Craske , Free BSD Questions list References: <16410.32120.8050.315995@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <002701c3e751$681c53c0$0464a8c0@alpha> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <002701c3e751$681c53c0$0464a8c0@alpha> X-Editor: gVim X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux X-Kernel-Version: 2.4.23 X-Uptime: 14:28:51 up 26 days, 1:32, 1 user, load average: 0.02, 0.06, 0.04 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: Stan Brown cc: Free BSD Questions list Subject: Re: Using bind9, instead of the default bind8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 19:32:04 -0000 On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 04:52:12PM -0000, Edmund Craske wrote: > There's something wrong with the rc.conf stuff for named if you install the bind9 port over the base bind8 (by doing a make > -DPORT_REPLACES_BASE_BIND9 install clean in dns/bind9) because of differences in command line arguments. Of course, you could just > work it out and hash it together, or leave the base bind8 alone entirely and install bind9 as a separate port... It doesn't really > matter either way, just make sure you're executing the bind9 named instead of the bind8 one. > Thnaks for the advice. I found the startup flags issue. it's as simple as not needing the "-g bind". Only the -u bind is allowd. I suppose I should make an effort to run this chrooted. Given that I did specify the DPORT_REPLACES_BASE_BIND9 optin, would the correct palce tp chroot be /etc/namedb? -- "They that would give up essential liberty for temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -- Benjamin Franklin