From owner-svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Fri Jun 24 23:30:04 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C4ECB8089F; Fri, 24 Jun 2016 23:30:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberto@keltia.freenix.fr) Received: from keltia.net (aran.keltia.net [88.191.250.24]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1759B27F0; Fri, 24 Jun 2016 23:30:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberto@keltia.freenix.fr) Received: from plexmediaserverlonrach.home (2a01cb000a256e00959d7a9ad54513fa.ipv6.abo.wanadoo.fr [IPv6:2a01:cb00:a25:6e00:959d:7a9a:d545:13fa]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: roberto) by keltia.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B7087529E; Sat, 25 Jun 2016 01:30:00 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2016 01:29:56 +0200 From: Ollivier Robert To: ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r417452 - head/security/doas Message-ID: <20160624232956.4hvvzg7vmkeme2qe@plexmediaserverlonrach.home> References: <201606242317.u5ONHdiK030777@repo.freebsd.org> <68B1BC9B-5FE5-48CD-94C1-5A2066A23516@adamw.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <68B1BC9B-5FE5-48CD-94C1-5A2066A23516@adamw.org> X-Operating-System: MacOS X / MBP 4,1 - FreeBSD 8.0 / T3500-E5520 Nehalem User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.1-neo (2016-05-23) X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2016 23:30:04 -0000 According to Adam Weinberger: > Just for the record here, you changed PORTVERSION, not PORTREVISION. As a result, if a 5.9.[0-9] gets released, you'll have to bump PORTEPOCH, because 5.9p1 > 5.9.1. As it is upstreamed from OpenBSD, I expect it to be changed in the next release there but you have a point, thanks. -- Ollivier ROBERT -=- FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! -=- roberto@keltia.freenix.fr In memoriam to Ondine : http://ondine.keltia.net/