From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jan  4 16:27:56 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 790571065673
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Tue,  4 Jan 2011 16:27:56 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from lists@opsec.eu)
Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 398778FC22
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Tue,  4 Jan 2011 16:27:56 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.72 (FreeBSD))
	(envelope-from <lists@opsec.eu>)
	id 1Pa9jp-000G2Q-8s; Tue, 04 Jan 2011 17:27:57 +0100
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2011 17:27:57 +0100
From: Kurt Jaeger <lists@opsec.eu>
To: Dima Panov <fluffy@fluffy.khv.ru>
Message-ID: <20110104162757.GT34314@home.opsec.eu>
References: <201101041437.08402.david@vizion2000.net>
	<4D233619.1000305@DataIX.net> <289781294155870@web149.yandex.ru>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <289781294155870@web149.yandex.ru>
Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: diablo-jdk- misses libodbcinst.so & conflicts libiodbc/virtuoso
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2011 16:27:56 -0000

Hi!

Dima Panov write:
> jhell@dataix.net wrote:

> > Replace libiodbc with unixODBC
> >
> > They provide the same layer that virtuoso would need for ODBC.

> Nope. unixODBC provide outdated API and lacks of some features,
> exist in libiodbc and required by virtuoso.

Ah, interesting. What's the difference ? So a drive to
replace unixODBC in every port would be more useful ?

-- 
pi@opsec.eu            +49 171 3101372                        10 years to go !