From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 26 04:53:24 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D04E816A4CE for ; Sat, 26 Jun 2004 04:53:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hm13.locaweb.com.br (hm13.locaweb.com.br [200.246.179.113]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7CD6C43D60 for ; Sat, 26 Jun 2004 04:53:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from japa@mhu.eti.br) Received: (qmail 15188 invoked from network); 26 Jun 2004 04:50:29 -0000 Received: from hm60.locaweb.com.br (200.213.197.160) by hm13.locaweb.com.br with QMTP; 26 Jun 2004 04:50:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 28375 invoked from network); 26 Jun 2004 04:51:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO dserver-2) (japa@mhu.eti.br@200.158.118.141) by hm60.locaweb.com.br with SMTP; 26 Jun 2004 04:51:24 -0000 Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2004 01:53:44 -0300 From: Marcos Hiroshi Umino To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20040626015344.75cf6c4e@dserver-2> In-Reply-To: <20040626044102.GQ29450@afflictions.org> References: <200406251853.45449.akbeech@northwindcom.dyndns.org> <20040626051838.A843@pukruppa.net> <20040626044102.GQ29450@afflictions.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.10claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: X.Org X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2004 04:53:24 -0000 On Sat, 26 Jun 2004 00:41:02 -0400 Damian Gerow wrote: > I just find the whole desktop to be much, much smoother after moving to > xorg. Again, I neither know nor understand why. Logic tells me it > shouldn't be so, but computer usage tells me it is. YMMV. I have a odd explanation that may make some sense to you. The reason is simply that the old xfree you had installed was compiled under old libs. XOrg was recently on your machine under supposedly new libs. That would be a a very possible explanation on linux, perhaps not in bsd. HtH Marcos.