From owner-freebsd-chat  Thu Nov 21 20:21:02 1996
Return-Path: owner-chat
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id UAA19917
          for chat-outgoing; Thu, 21 Nov 1996 20:21:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cedar.netten.net (root@cedar.netten.net [205.244.191.3])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id UAA19898
          for <chat@freebsd.org>; Thu, 21 Nov 1996 20:20:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tracyphi (d0.netten.net [205.244.191.120]) by cedar.netten.net (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id WAA26485 for <chat@freebsd.org>; Thu, 21 Nov 1996 22:21:13 -0600
Message-ID: <32952AD5.2AB0@cedar.netten.net>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 1996 22:23:49 -0600
From: Tracy Phillips <tphilips@cedar.netten.net>
Reply-To: tphilips@cedar.netten.net
Organization: redpoint.com
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01 (Win95; I)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: chat@freebsd.org
Subject: neXtaw and Tkstep anyone?
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-chat@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

hi,

is anyone using neXtaw and tkstep with freebsd. if so what are your
experiances (good or bad)

peace,

                             .........
Tracy Phillips                 `:::'                  .......  ......
tphilips@cedar.netten.net       :::  *                  `::.    ::'
                                ::: .::  .:.::.  .:: .::  `::. :'
                                :::  ::   ::  ::  ::  ::    .::.
                                ::: .::. .::  ::.  `::::. .:'  ::.
                             ...:::.....................::'   .::::..

 UNIX is user friendly. It's just selective about who its friends are.