From owner-freebsd-mobile Mon Jun 14 21: 7:52 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D05E414D1A for ; Mon, 14 Jun 1999 21:07:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA46069; Mon, 14 Jun 1999 22:07:48 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id WAA86326; Mon, 14 Jun 1999 22:07:27 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <199906150407.WAA86326@harmony.village.org> To: obrien@NUXI.com Subject: Re: apmd for FreeBSD Cc: freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 14 Jun 1999 20:34:33 PDT." <19990614203433.A48046@nuxi.com> References: <19990614203433.A48046@nuxi.com> <19990614141928.A44318@nuxi.com> <199906101257.VAA16619@tasogare.imasy.or.jp> <19990614141928.A44318@nuxi.com> <199906150327.VAA86182@harmony.village.org> Date: Mon, 14 Jun 1999 22:07:27 -0600 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org In message <19990614203433.A48046@nuxi.com> "David O'Brien" writes: : > Feel free to wait for this to be incorporated into -current before you : : Do you have plans on doing this? I was trying to volunteer to take the : initiative and commit things like this. At the moment, I have no plans to do this. iwasaki-san will know when it is ready. When and if it is ready to go into -current, I'll be happy offer any assistance, up to and including committing it it should iwasaki-san not be able to do it himself.[*] : I didn't intend for my message to be harsh, but I keep my stand that : developing for -CURRENT (or a snapshot of -CURRENT, thus avoiding the : problems if daily keeping up) is desired if one wishes their bits : incorporated into FreeBSD source tree. True. I don't think that he was saying that it is ready to go into -current yet. It is ready to be thoughfully reviewed. I suddenly find myself with more time to review these things than I thought I would have. : > There are many examples in the past that were done first in -stable and : > then ported to -current after they stablized. While they were first : > integrated into -current, but much work were done in -stable. : : *IF* they do that. Where is PAO for -CURRENT then? PAO has been around : for a long time. I think that many things are in the pipeline that will answer this question... For example, the PAO/newconfig pccard/cardbuss stuff is being ported to -current's newbus even as I'm typing this. [*] I don't know iwasaki-san's gender, but I'm assuming it is male. If that isn't the case, please forgive my presumption. Warner P.S. If I sound overly harsh, please forgive me. It has been a long, surprise filled day: Flakey bugs in the morning, RIF in the afternoon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message