From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Mar 15 05:38:44 1995 Return-Path: questions-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id FAA29249 for questions-outgoing; Wed, 15 Mar 1995 05:38:44 -0800 Received: from django.inria.fr (django.inria.fr [138.96.24.70]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id FAA29243 for ; Wed, 15 Mar 1995 05:38:34 -0800 Received: by django.inria.fr (8.6.10/8.6.10) id OAA12465; Wed, 15 Mar 1995 14:38:07 +0100 Message-Id: <199503151338.OAA12465@django.inria.fr> To: davidg@Root.COM cc: questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Routing and Ethernet In-reply-to: your message of Wed, 15 Mar 1995 03:20:40 PST. Date: Wed, 15 Mar 1995 14:38:07 +0100 From: Andres Vega Garcia Sender: questions-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk : David Greenman wrote: >> The 700-800 kb/s limit for 3com509 is probably because 1) i measured this by > ftp >>transfers so actual rate can be more.2) We have here Twisted Pair made networ >k >>which is much more slow then coax... > > 1) FTP is *not* the way to measure performance. What would be a good test? > 2) 10BaseT has *exactly* the same performance as coax. > >-DG Andres ------------------------------ INRIA Sophia-Antipolis, France avega@pax.inria.fr