From owner-freebsd-questions Fri Feb 21 12: 6:14 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E81737B401 for ; Fri, 21 Feb 2003 12:06:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from sage.thought.org (dsl231-043-140.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.231.43.140]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CB1643F93 for ; Fri, 21 Feb 2003 12:06:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: from thought.org (root@tao [10.0.0.247]) by sage.thought.org (8.11.4/8.11.4) with ESMTP id h1LK7EI76416; Fri, 21 Feb 2003 12:07:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: (from kline@localhost) by thought.org (8.12.6/8.11.3) id h1LK6Bh8038110; Fri, 21 Feb 2003 12:06:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kline) Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 12:06:10 -0800 From: Gary D Kline To: Justin Hopper Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Cvsup Handbook Example Message-ID: <20030221200610.GA37950@tao.thought.org> References: <20030221151412.D867B43FBF@mx1.FreeBSD.org> <1045854810.22986.479.camel@home.gusalmighty.com> <1045856524.23001.515.camel@home.gusalmighty.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1045856524.23001.515.camel@home.gusalmighty.com> X-Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. X-Of_Interest: Observing 16 years of service to the Unix community User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 11:42:05AM -0800, Justin Hopper wrote: > Sorry, this of course should have read 'after 665 and before 667'. > > On Fri, 2003-02-21 at 11:13, Justin Hopper wrote: > > Hello unamed person, > > > > For the rest of the world that doesn't follow Christian Mythology, 666 > > is just the number after 667 and before 665. I've used 666 in several > > coding examples, usually for client/server socket daemons, as most > > people don't have anything using port 666. > > > > Would you rather that the good people of FreeBSD be barred from using > > particular numbers? This could pose a problem. (I think this unnamed gentleman [[ women are seldom so dense ]] merely dosn't understand 0ctal. Mayhaps he could use binary: "10110110 || 110 110 110". Hm?) -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org www.thought.org Public service Unix To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message