From owner-freebsd-questions Sat Jan 22 11:40:48 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from cs.tamu.edu (clavin.cs.tamu.edu [128.194.130.106]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5053814ED6 for ; Sat, 22 Jan 2000 11:40:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sks1974@cs.tamu.edu) Received: from dilbert.cs.tamu.edu (IDENT:2708@dilbert [128.194.133.100]) by cs.tamu.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA29769 for ; Sat, 22 Jan 2000 13:40:42 -0600 (CST) Received: from localhost (sks1974@localhost) by dilbert.cs.tamu.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA03140 for ; Sat, 22 Jan 2000 13:40:42 -0600 (CST) X-Authentication-Warning: dilbert.cs.tamu.edu: sks1974 owned process doing -bs Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2000 13:40:41 -0600 (CST) From: Suresh Kumar Satapati X-Sender: sks1974@dilbert To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Networking Question Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I have two subnets with one host routing packets to both the subnets. All hosts are running Kernel 3.3 I dont see a typical TCP protocol performance (in terms of achieved throughput when sending packets of different sizes 16,32,64...2048) when i send packets from one host to another host in the other subnet. I am using TTCP application on both the hosts (in sender and receiver modes). In a single subnet, the throghput looks good. Problems seems to be only when I route packets. Do i have to do some router configuration to obtain a good throughput ?? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message