From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Nov 13 5:14: 5 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from pcnet1.pcnet.com (pcnet1.pcnet.com [204.213.232.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2636B37B4CF for ; Mon, 13 Nov 2000 05:14:01 -0800 (PST) Received: (from eischen@localhost) by pcnet1.pcnet.com (8.8.7/PCNet) id IAA21265; Mon, 13 Nov 2000 08:13:41 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2000 08:13:41 -0500 (EST) From: Daniel Eischen To: stable@freebsd.org Cc: "Daniel M. Eischen" , stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libc shlib version In-Reply-To: <20001113025326.A79642@dragon.nuxi.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 13 Nov 2000, David O'Brien wrote: > On Mon, Nov 13, 2000 at 04:44:17AM -0500, Daniel M. Eischen wrote: > > > > Why not find what was added and back it out? > > Why loose the functionality. Bumping a shared version isn't that big a > deal. It hasn't been shown that functionality would be lost. If it can't be worked around and functionality is lost, then I agree -- leave it in. > > > Aren't we going to need yet another version bump for 5.0? > > -current libc will have to be bumped at the same time it is in RELENG_4 > as they are current at the same value. I mean when 5.0 is released. There's bound to be more changes that require another version bump. Wasn't it dg who was waiting to add some changes to libc requiring a version bump? -- Dan Eischen To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message