From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 2 05:05:13 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F31916A4CE for ; Tue, 2 Dec 2003 05:05:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.des.no (flood.des.no [217.116.83.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5385A43F93 for ; Tue, 2 Dec 2003 05:05:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: by smtp.des.no (Pony Express, from userid 666) id 56370530C; Tue, 2 Dec 2003 14:05:09 +0100 (CET) Received: from dwp.des.no (des.no [80.203.228.37]) by smtp.des.no (Pony Express) with ESMTP id E7D765308; Tue, 2 Dec 2003 14:04:59 +0100 (CET) Received: by dwp.des.no (Postfix, from userid 2602) id 3CC1933C7B; Tue, 2 Dec 2003 14:04:59 +0100 (CET) To: Tillman Hodgson References: <02be01c3b5a6$a78a8ea0$b901320a@komi.mts.ru> <20031201142936.GD99428@madman.celabo.org> <20031201144304.GB90713@seekingfire.com> From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2003 14:04:59 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20031201144304.GB90713@seekingfire.com> (Tillman Hodgson's message of "Mon, 1 Dec 2003 08:43:04 -0600") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.090024 (Oort Gnus v0.24) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on flood.des.no X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no version=2.60 cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Kerberized applications in FreeBSD 5.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Security issues [members-only posting] List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2003 13:05:13 -0000 Tillman Hodgson writes: > Could you explain this a bit further? I'm pretty familiar with Kerberos > and I wasn't aware of this issue. I think I might be mis-parsing your > email to mean "competing standards" when it might mean "competing > clients", in which case it makes more sense :-) Competing servers, actually. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no