From owner-freebsd-chat Sat Oct 24 15:42:31 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA12755 for freebsd-chat-outgoing; Sat, 24 Oct 1998 15:42:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from pop02.globecomm.net (pop02.globecomm.net [206.253.129.186]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA12750 for ; Sat, 24 Oct 1998 15:42:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from higginsj@iname.com) Received: from iname.com (PHLAB304-42.splitrock.net [209.156.78.241]) by pop02.globecomm.net (8.9.0/8.8.0) with ESMTP id SAA08362; Sat, 24 Oct 1998 18:42:25 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <363257F0.5775CAE7@iname.com> Date: Sat, 24 Oct 1998 18:42:56 -0400 From: James Higgins X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (Win98; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dg@root.com CC: chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: another record References: <199810241823.LAA05442@implode.root.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org David Greenman wrote: > * Long Snip * > > >Can you give us some more details on wcarchives other upcoming upgrades? > > > >You had mentioned putting a 400Mhz Xeon in. Is this change going to a > >allow more ftp sessions or just get the load average under 30 occasionally? > > > > > >Thanks! ;-) > > The load average on a machine like wcarchive might just as well be a random > number. It's a composite of both disk and CPU "load" and isn't useful in our > case for determining the machine's potential. In fact, what is interesting > is that the load average (which is typically around 25-60 on wcarchive, but > varies a lot) is so LOW. Don't forget that we have *3500* file downloads go > on. One might expect the load average to be well into the hundreds. This is something that has been in my mind for quite a while. Just exactly how is the load average on a machine calculated? It seems to very from OS to OS and I have never really been able to make much sense of it other than to tell if something really out of the ordinary is happening on a machine. (ie 6 hits at work and the load average shoots up I just ran into the daily backup, time to go home) > As for planned upgrades, we'll be going to Xeon/4xx in a month or so. The > main reason for doing this is the increased memory capacity - the new machine > will have 4GB of RAM. This will allow us to increase the FTP limit to at > least 10000 users. My main concern at the moment is that we don't have > sufficient network bandwidth to support that many users (we're just hitting > the limit of our 100Mbps circuit with 3500 users). We're talking with CRL > about our options. I'm advocating gigabit ethernet, but we may have to > settle for multiple 100Mbps circuits in the short term. One word: Wow! James Higgins To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message