From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 2 18:59:54 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9289616A92D for ; Tue, 2 May 2006 18:59:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from uspoerlein@gmail.com) Received: from nproxy.gmail.com (nproxy.gmail.com [64.233.182.186]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49A1443D48 for ; Tue, 2 May 2006 18:59:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from uspoerlein@gmail.com) Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id m18so713379nfc for ; Tue, 02 May 2006 11:59:41 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition; b=GH/h4fXEwFPTIjfvAcAWWv3G7zzqEOhffP6LcDpnx5L1/EhAvWkNtL3RjUd/U3Rnzo4Maci7RmULeUzd1e5ki+da0uokDyNndd4UXSlFCZZqa3+qEIvQVqbp7RePqdkFZGuzJ+bIjM768tMw6ejDQAt4Xt/5KSvsLQAOGhjl7lg= Received: by 10.49.3.6 with SMTP id f6mr767610nfi; Tue, 02 May 2006 11:59:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from roadrunner.q.local ( [217.185.118.14]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id l22sm279626nfc.2006.05.02.11.59.37; Tue, 02 May 2006 11:59:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from roadrunner.q.local (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by roadrunner.q.local (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k42IwokN007779 for ; Tue, 2 May 2006 20:58:50 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from uspoerlein@gmail.com) Received: (from q@localhost) by roadrunner.q.local (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id k42HIDXe007463 for stable@freebsd.org; Tue, 2 May 2006 19:18:13 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from uspoerlein@gmail.com) Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 19:18:13 +0200 From: Ulrich Spoerlein To: stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060502171813.GA7296@roadrunner.q.local> Mail-Followup-To: stable@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="liOOAslEiF7prFVr" Content-Disposition: inline Cc: Subject: ipw2100 vs ndis(4) -- does it work for anybody? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 May 2006 18:59:55 -0000 --liOOAslEiF7prFVr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Good day, since the ipw(4) driver can't do WPA, I wanted to give ndis(4) a try. This *used* to work back on 5.3 (memory is a bit vague) but it ain't happening on 6.1-RC. I'm using the same driver as last time, which is the version 1.2.2.8 =66rom Intel. I also downloaded the newest one, version 1.2.4.35, but none of them attach, when loading the if_ndis module. /sys/modules/if_ndis# make clean /sys/modules/if_ndis# ndiscvt -i /compat/ndis/w70n51.inf -s /compat/ndis/w7= 0n51.sys -o ndis_driver_data.h /sys/modules/if_ndis# make /sys/modules/if_ndis# make install load /sbin/kldload -v /vol/obj/usr/src/sys/modules/if_ndis/if_ndis.ko Loaded /vol/obj/usr/src/sys/modules/if_ndis/if_ndis.ko, id=3D32 pci2: at device 3.0 (no driver attached) none1@pci2:3:0: class=3D0x028000 card=3D0x25618086 chip=3D0x10438086 rev=3D= 0x04 hdr=3D0x00 vendor =3D 'Intel Corporation' device =3D 'Intel(R) PRO/Wireless 2100 LAN Card Driver' class =3D network I know this did work in the past. What are other peoples experiences? Besides, does ndis(4) even do WPA? If not then I would have to buy new hardware anyway and the whole exercise would be in vain. Ulrich Spoerlein --=20 PGP Key ID: 20FEE9DD Encrypted mail welcome! Fingerprint: AEC9 AF5E 01AC 4EE1 8F70 6CBD E76E 2227 20FE E9DD Which is worse: ignorance or apathy? Don't know. Don't care. --liOOAslEiF7prFVr Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEV5RV524iJyD+6d0RAvb+AJ9tp/abnN24yF5ZqNbC7K0HztIQXACgt2Vw FKKobShXMM0WcvFCZbUN0TI= =GZeR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --liOOAslEiF7prFVr--