From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 16:00:02 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B770106564A for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 16:00:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dmk@ncf.ca) Received: from mail.ncf.ca (mail.ncf.ca [134.117.136.45]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01CDB8FC14 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 16:00:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.ncf.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.ncf.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84DD69F171 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 11:50:43 -0400 (EDT) Received: from hudson.private.lan (CPE0014bfb32f8a-CM0014e887dd48.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [174.114.186.180]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: du880) by mail.ncf.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7011B9F16A for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 11:50:43 -0400 (EDT) From: Dwayne MacKinnon To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 11:50:42 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (FreeBSD/9.0-RELEASE; KDE/4.7.4; amd64; ; ) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201204251150.42910.dmk@ncf.ca> X-NCF-Filtered: By ProxSMTP on pallando Wed Apr 25 11:50:43 2012 -0400 (EDT) Subject: New xorg and older Intel video X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 16:00:02 -0000 Hi all, Just a quick question: I run a couple of boxes that use older Intel video (no KMS). Am I correct in my belief I should avoid the WITH_NEW_XORG flag? A cc would be appreciated, as I'm not subscribed. Thanks, DMK