From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Jun 25 23:41:37 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.2.69.218]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A20D37B400 for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2002 23:41:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1]) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.12.4/8.12.4) with ESMTP id g5Q6fV4W053494; Wed, 26 Jun 2002 07:41:31 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: (from matthew@localhost) by happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.12.4/8.12.4/Submit) id g5Q6fOjh053493; Wed, 26 Jun 2002 07:41:24 +0100 (BST) Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 07:41:24 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman To: Scott Mitchell Cc: Matthew Seaman , Christopher Schulte , Lord Raiden , Marco Radzinschi , FreeBDS-Questions Subject: Re: Upcoming OpenSSH vulnerability (fwd) Message-ID: <20020626064124.GA53337@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophi> References: <5.1.1.6.2.20020624224948.02923518@pop3s.schulte.org> <20020624234646.G22328-100000@mail.radzinschi.com> <4.2.0.58.20020625134233.009992b0@pop.netzero.net> <5.1.1.6.2.20020625124040.041c50f0@pop3s.schulte.org> <20020625205840.B381@fishballoon.dyndns.org> <20020625205928.GA50230@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophi> <20020625232606.C381@fishballoon.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020625232606.C381@fishballoon.dyndns.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 11:26:06PM +0100, Scott Mitchell wrote: > I see the openssh-portable port Makefile has a OPENSSH_OVERWRITE_BASE > option. Presumably I can set that and NO_OPENSSH in make.conf to have the > port replace the base ssh temporarily -- fewer things to undo when 3.4p1 > hits the base system. Any non-obvious disadvantages to that approach that > I'm not seeing? That sounds quite reasonable, but I don't really know of any gotchas as I just installed the port under /usr/local and left the rest of the system as it was. Your choice. Matthew -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks Savill Way Tel: +44 1628 476614 Marlow Fax: +44 0870 0522645 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message