From owner-freebsd-questions Fri Feb 23 7:22:19 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from freeze.org (www.bellnetworks.net [208.177.187.234]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC55137B4EC for ; Fri, 23 Feb 2001 07:22:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jim@freeze.org) Received: (from jim@localhost) by freeze.org (8.11.2/8.11.2) id f1NFLBf05963; Fri, 23 Feb 2001 10:21:11 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jim) X-Authentication-Warning: www.bellnetworks.net: Processed from queue /var/spool/alt_queue X-Authentication-Warning: www.bellnetworks.net: Processed by jim with -C /web/siteinfo/freeze/mail/sendmail.cf Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 10:21:11 -0500 (EST) From: Jim Freeze X-Sender: jim@www.bellnetworks.net To: questions@freebsd.org Subject: OT: Which programming shell, sh or csh? Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I am writing some small scripts for our users to help them interact with cvs. I have looked at using either sh or csh, but I cannot find any information as to why I would choose one over the other. Can some experienced person guide me in which is best to use? Does it really matter? Pros/Cons? Thanks ========================================================= Jim Freeze jim@freeze.org --------------------------------------------------------- "So, it should be relatively easy ... this is the phrase I use when someone else is the most obvious person to do something." Harry Ohlsen ========================================================= To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message