From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jul 15 17:09:26 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id RAA10133 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Wed, 15 Jul 1998 17:09:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from pop.uniserve.com (pop.uniserve.com [204.244.156.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id RAA10125; Wed, 15 Jul 1998 17:09:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tom@uniserve.com) Received: from shell.uniserve.ca [204.244.186.218] by pop.uniserve.com with smtp (Exim 1.82 #4) id 0ywbbm-0004hw-00; Wed, 15 Jul 1998 17:09:14 -0700 Date: Wed, 15 Jul 1998 17:09:11 -0700 (PDT) From: Tom X-Sender: tom@shell.uniserve.ca To: Dom Mitchell cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG, questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Disgruntled Linux User... questions about FreeBSD In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, 15 Jul 1998, Dom Mitchell wrote: > CyberPeasant writes: > > The BSD's behave much more like a commercial Unix: > > No they don't; they crash less often and have more features. I don't know about crashing, but BSDs have less features than commercial features. There may be a corespondance between features and crashing. For example, FreeBSD doesn't have SMP in a release yet, nor things like clustering or multipath IO. > -- > ``If make doesn't do what you expect it to, it's a good chance the > makefile is wrong.'' -- Adam de Boor Tom To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message