From owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 12 18:40:45 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4230D16A400 for ; Sat, 12 May 2007 18:40:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05AE213C45A for ; Sat, 12 May 2007 18:40:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5F2A20A7; Sat, 12 May 2007 20:40:40 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Tests: AWL X-Spam-Learn: disabled X-Spam-Score: 0.0/3.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) on tim.des.no Received: from dwp.des.no (des.no [80.203.243.180]) by smtp.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2386620A6; Sat, 12 May 2007 20:40:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: by dwp.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id F3D805462; Sat, 12 May 2007 20:40:36 +0200 (CEST) From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?utf-8?Q?Sm=C3=B8rgrav?=) To: Dan Langille References: <20070511125241.O3724@ngaio.unixathome.org> Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 20:40:36 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20070511125241.O3724@ngaio.unixathome.org> (Dan Langille's message of "Fri\, 11 May 2007 12\:53\:55 -0400 \(EDT\)") Message-ID: <86646x51i3.fsf@dwp.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Hardware support X-BeenThere: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Non technical items related to the community List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 18:40:45 -0000 Dan Langille writes: > My work (yes, Im now employed) is looking at deploying servers to > client sites. They arent so much servers as appliances. The boxes > serve a distinct function, and not much else. > > Our hardware needs: > between 2TB and 8TB of storage in a RAID configuration > 1U or 2U case > good reputation Sounds like you need a SunFire X4500, except they're 4U. I'm not sure you can get 8 TB into 2U with today's hardware; you'd need at least 16 data disks, plus parity and spares, say 20 altogether. The most I've ever seen in a 2U case is 8. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no