From owner-freebsd-toolchain@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 12 09:09:20 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: toolchain@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 688191065688 for ; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 09:09:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@dougbarton.us) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx22.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D17C78FC1E for ; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 09:09:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 11560 invoked by uid 399); 12 Sep 2012 09:09:09 -0000 Received: from udp290486uds.hawaiiantel.net (HELO ?192.168.1.30?) (dougb@dougbarton.us@72.253.187.69) by mail2.fluidhosting.com with ESMTPAM; 12 Sep 2012 09:09:09 -0000 X-Originating-IP: 72.253.187.69 X-Sender: dougb@dougbarton.us Message-ID: <5050513C.7040100@dougbarton.us> Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 23:09:16 -1000 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120827 Thunderbird/15.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Steve Kargl References: <20120910211207.GC64920@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> <20120911104518.GF37286@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <20120911120649.GA52235@freebsd.org> <20120911132410.GA87126@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <504F4645.4070900@FreeBSD.org> <20120911150356.GA87526@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: <20120911150356.GA87526@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: toolchain@FreeBSD.org, Roman Divacky , Dimitry Andric , current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Clang as default compiler November 4th X-BeenThere: freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Maintenance of FreeBSD's integrated toolchain List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 09:09:20 -0000 On 09/11/2012 05:03 AM, Steve Kargl wrote: > On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 04:10:13PM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote: >> >> However, I think the majority of users can get by just fine using clang, >> right now. Doug Barton even confirmed in this thread that 80% of our >> ports already work with it! > > He stated that 80% build with clang. I doubt that he actually > tested the functionality of some 17000 ports. Correct. Also, users who actually are helping with testing clang for ports continue to report runtime problems, even with things that build fine. Doug