From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 13 08:42:08 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4B8016A41C for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 08:42:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.NUXI.org (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B9C843D1F for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 08:42:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.NUXI.org (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.NUXI.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j5D8fn7X062595; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 01:41:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.NUXI.org) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.NUXI.org (8.13.4/8.13.1/Submit) id j5D8fnlP062594; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 01:41:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 01:41:49 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" To: =?unknown-8bit?Q?Bj=F6rn_K=F6nig?= Message-ID: <20050613084148.GA57865@dragon.NUXI.org> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, =?unknown-8bit?Q?Bj=F6rn_K=F6nig?= References: <84dead720506091950779d1661@mail.gmail.com> <86oeae3d8f.fsf@xps.des.no> <20050610071828.GB78035@ip.net.ua> <867jh23bwh.fsf@xps.des.no> <20050610074706.GE78035@ip.net.ua> <20050612022105.GB67746@dragon.NUXI.org> <20050612042406.GB5996@soaustin.net> <20050613065618.GA30092@dragon.NUXI.org> <42AD3388.2010009@cs.tu-berlin.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <42AD3388.2010009@cs.tu-berlin.de> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.0-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [current tinderbox] failure on ...all... X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 08:42:09 -0000 On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 09:19:36AM +0200, Bjrn Knig wrote: > David O'Brien wrote: > >I could say that about tons of other ports. The gcc28 port works fine, > >and I don't see what is wrong with the patch I supplied. gcc28 is still > >the fastest compiler (in terms of compiler speed) we have on FreeBSD. It > >is still useful. > > For what is it useful? It can't compile C++ code, Funny for me, I just compiled some C++ code (using catch-throw) exceptions and it ran fine. > it has a lack of > standard conformance, gcc295 isn't quite worse and the utility ccache is > a good choice you if you need fast recompilation. Then for you, use gcc295. But there is C++ code and C code that gcc295 won't compile. That is why I keep gcc28 around. I don't see why the existence of gcc28 is a hardship for you. I've even set NO_CDROM to not be a burden for you. It builds in 1 minute 30 seconds on my machine, so its not a burden on the package cluster either. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)