From owner-freebsd-chat Sat Oct 24 17:15:32 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id RAA18609 for freebsd-chat-outgoing; Sat, 24 Oct 1998 17:15:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from python.shoal.net.au (python.shoal.net.au [203.26.44.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA18604 for ; Sat, 24 Oct 1998 17:15:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from andrew@python.shoal.net.au) Received: from localhost (andrew@localhost) by python.shoal.net.au (8.8.6/8.8.5) with SMTP id LAA07990; Sun, 25 Oct 1998 11:14:48 +1100 (EST) Date: Sun, 25 Oct 1998 11:14:47 +1100 (EST) From: Andrew Perry Reply-To: Andrew Perry To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" cc: chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: http://www.performance-computing.com/features/9810of1.shtml In-Reply-To: <3927.909217631.1@time.cdrom.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Jordan, would it help if others complained to the same address. Not only for the reasons you mentioned but also as the graphic is contrary to a few things you have mentioned in the article, such as the "Comparing FreeBSD to Linux" section and your conclusion. Your well balanced article gains an unfortunate "Linux bashings" slant just by that one graphic while the article itself does no such thing. Andrew Perry On Sat, 24 Oct 1998, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > Date: Sat, 24 Oct 1998 01:27:11 -0700 > From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" > To: undisclosed-recipients: ; > Subject: Re: http://www.performance-computing.com/features/9810of1.shtml > [NON-Text Body part not included] To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message