From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Dec  4 02:41:12 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 067483C5
 for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Wed,  4 Dec 2013 02:41:12 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from eg.sd.rdtc.ru (eg.sd.rdtc.ru [IPv6:2a03:3100:c:13::5])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 674621856
 for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Wed,  4 Dec 2013 02:41:11 +0000 (UTC)
X-Envelope-From: egrosbein@rdtc.ru
X-Envelope-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from eg.sd.rdtc.ru (eugen@localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eg.sd.rdtc.ru (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id rB42f50d014420;
 Wed, 4 Dec 2013 09:41:05 +0700 (NOVT)
 (envelope-from egrosbein@rdtc.ru)
Message-ID: <529E9641.5000008@rdtc.ru>
Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2013 09:41:05 +0700
From: Eugene Grosbein <egrosbein@rdtc.ru>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64;
 rv:17.0) Gecko/20130415 Thunderbird/17.0.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Matthias Andree <matthias.andree@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: fsck_y_enable is broken for SUJ as well as fsck_ffs
References: <529DA855.9040406@rdtc.ru> <529E6815.3080208@gmx.de>
In-Reply-To: <529E6815.3080208@gmx.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00
 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-Spam-Report: * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP
 * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 *      [score: 0.0000]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eg.sd.rdtc.ru
Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-stable>,
 <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
 <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2013 02:41:12 -0000

On 04.12.2013 06:24, Matthias Andree wrote:

[skip]

> ...and then reboot, and hope for the best WRT hardware not lying to the
> kernel (some makers let their drives report completion without
> supercapacitors or nvram or battery backup before data was on permanent
> storage in the past) - I've never tried that with RAID1 though, but on a
> bare UFS2+SU+J it appears to help with avoiding SU+J inconsistencies in
> Virtual machines if I forget to shut them down before rebooting the host.

That's another topic - how to avoid inconsistencies.
My question was "how to fix inconsistencies automatically".

Eugene Grosbein