From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 12 07:28:10 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3DFD16A4CE for ; Fri, 12 Dec 2003 07:28:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from memphis.mephi.ru (memphis.mephi.ru [194.67.67.234]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C591443D33 for ; Fri, 12 Dec 2003 07:28:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from timon@memphis.mephi.ru) Received: from [192.168.0.3] (ppp8-66.pppoe.mtu-net.ru [81.195.8.66]) (authenticated bits=0) by memphis.mephi.ru (8.12.6p2/8.12.6) with ESMTP id hBCFS4rG085113; Fri, 12 Dec 2003 18:28:05 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from timon@memphis.mephi.ru) From: "Artem 'Zazoobr' Ignatjev" To: "Christoph P. Kukulies" In-Reply-To: <20031212143609.GA20325@gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de> References: <200312070945.hB79jKds039814@www.kukulies.org> <1071238350.735.3.camel@timon.nist> <20031212143609.GA20325@gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1071242883.735.24.camel@timon.nist> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 18:28:03 +0300 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gimp fails suddenly X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 15:28:10 -0000 On Fri, 12.12.2003, at 17:36, Christoph P. Kukulies wrote: > On Fri, Dec 12, 2003 at 05:12:31PM +0300, Artem 'Zazoobr' Ignatjev wrote: > > I've found following advise after installing vmware3 port... > > That revived gimp back for me: > > > > sysctl -w kern.ipc.shm_allow_removed=1 > > > > I've put it into sysctl.conf, and run with it. > > That's fine. Just tell me, what does this actually mean? Is it practically > the same as running gimp --no-shm ? Or is shm activated (like a module being > not present and the getting loaded?). I think it's being activated... Dunno, it works for me - I pray for it (: quick grep thru kernel sources shows that without this kernel will return NULL for shared memory in some cases -- Artem 'Zazoobr' Ignatjev