From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Dec 8 10:58:22 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from vinyl.sentex.ca (vinyl.sentex.ca [209.112.4.14]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1C861516D; Wed, 8 Dec 1999 10:51:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from granite.sentex.net (granite-atm.sentex.ca [209.112.4.1]) by vinyl.sentex.ca (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA56966; Wed, 8 Dec 1999 13:51:35 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from simoeon (simeon.sentex.ca [209.112.4.47]) by granite.sentex.net (8.8.8/8.6.9) with SMTP id NAA10224; Wed, 8 Dec 1999 13:51:35 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.19991208135002.01d82140@staff.sentex.ca> X-Sender: mdtpop@staff.sentex.ca X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.5 (32) Date: Wed, 08 Dec 1999 13:50:02 -0500 To: Joe Greco From: Mike Tancsa Subject: Re: Route table leaks Cc: jgreco@ns.sol.net, jdp@polstra.com, stable@FreeBSD.ORG, current@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <199912081451.IAA61233@aurora.sol.net> References: <3.0.5.32.19991208094433.01610ac0@staff.sentex.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 08:51 AM 12/8/99 -0600, Joe Greco wrote: >Most of which are routes pointing at the 3 private-net interfaces on the >machine. The info was provided more as a comparison, that quantity of routes do not necessary mean leak ? Or perhaps it does. But after 90 days, you would think the problem would have been hit no ? ---Mike ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400 Network Administrator, mike@sentex.net Sentex Communications www.sentex.net Cambridge, Ontario Canada To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message