From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 29 12:25:55 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 502B516A41F for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 12:25:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from b.candler@pobox.com) Received: from thorn.pobox.com (thorn.pobox.com [208.210.124.75]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E310843D4C for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 12:25:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from b.candler@pobox.com) Received: from thorn (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thorn.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31FBDBA; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 07:26:15 -0500 (EST) Received: from mappit.local.linnet.org (212-74-113-67.static.dsl.as9105.com [212.74.113.67]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by thorn.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAD7727EA; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 07:26:12 -0500 (EST) Received: from lists by mappit.local.linnet.org with local (Exim 4.60 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Erwqr-0002t5-OB; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 12:25:49 +0000 Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 12:25:49 +0000 From: Brian Candler To: Alexey Popov Message-ID: <20051229122549.GA11055@uk.tiscali.com> References: <20051228143817.GA6898@uk.tiscali.com> <001401c60bc0$a3c87e90$1200a8c0@gsicomp.on.ca> <20051228153106.GA7041@uk.tiscali.com> <20051228164339.GB3875@zen.inc> <43B38747.1060906@iteranet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <43B38747.1060906@iteranet.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, VANHULLEBUS Yvan Subject: Re: IPSEC documentation X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 12:25:55 -0000 On Thu, Dec 29, 2005 at 09:50:47AM +0300, Alexey Popov wrote: > If we would also have NAT-T support, FreeBSD would be the best choice > of VPN concentrator. /usr/ports/security/ipsec-tools/pkg-descr says: "Known issues: - Non-threaded implementation. Simultaneous key negotiation performance should be improved." I think that would limit its usefulness as a scalable concentrator, if the comment is still valid.