From owner-freebsd-current Sun Oct 13 21:38:24 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 591A937B401 for ; Sun, 13 Oct 2002 21:38:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from slackerbsd.org (pcp02155875pcs.walngs01.pa.comcast.net [68.81.47.129]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9D4843EA9 for ; Sun, 13 Oct 2002 21:38:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from carl@slackerbsd.org) Received: by slackerbsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C034110141; Mon, 14 Oct 2002 04:38:21 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 00:38:21 -0400 From: Carl Schmidt To: Makoto Matsushita Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: Old port recompiles needed (Re: Unknown symbol "__sF") Message-ID: <20021014043821.GC24069@carbon.slackerbsd.org> Reply-To: Carl Schmidt Mail-Followup-To: Makoto Matsushita , current@freebsd.org References: <3DA9EA62.D337E8A0@mindspring.com> <20021014114320A.matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org> <20021014032931.GB23539@carbon.slackerbsd.org> <20021014124541A.matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20021014124541A.matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 12:45:41PM +0900, Makoto Matsushita wrote: > carl> 3.4 hours is a lot of time on a dial-up connection (granted it > carl> is not a one size fits all period of time). > > You forget that you still compressed image with about 30 hours (at > least, full 1 day or more), and it is not helpful for ordinal users, > not you. I fail to see how a reduction of hours (even just one) is insignificant to someone on a dial-up connection. Time is money for some people; even a meager three hours. > Again, reducing hours/percentages with compressed image doesn't > matter; please focus total download time which is actually needed for > all users. Missing the point is not helpful for the discussion. Again, I fail to see how a reduction in download time for -anyone- is insignificant. Can you explain how I am missing the point? I think it would be better to focus on whether or not the snapshot machine can even handle such a task, and, more importantly, whether the administrator even wants to do it. I e-mailed buildadm@jp.freebsd.org about the task. If that is you I hope you'll forward your response to the freebsd-current list. -- Carl Schmidt [Random Quote] Be careful of reading health books, you might die of a misprint. -- Mark Twain To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message