From owner-freebsd-questions Fri Jun 22 0: 7:42 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from silence.sparrows.ici (chello212186015038.11.univie.teleweb.at [212.186.15.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2EB237B406 for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 00:07:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from content@openprojects.net) Received: from there (Q.sparrow.ici [192.168.0.99]) by silence.sparrows.ici (8.11.2/8.11.2/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) with SMTP id f5M77Wk16688; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 09:07:32 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Darian Lanx Reply-To: bio@gmx.net Organization: KDE Message-Id: <200106220906.49555@obscuro.org> To: kstewart@urx.com Subject: Re: IBM DTLA307030 (which is an UDMA100 device) only seen as UDMA33 ? Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 09:08:12 +0200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2.2] References: <200106220335.15791@obscuro.org> <3B32B0E1.807435C4@urx.com> In-Reply-To: <3B32B0E1.807435C4@urx.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Have you set the BIOS to permit dma on the new drive? Hello kent, thanks for the answer Yes, the BIOS allows UDMA mode 5 (which is ata 100) Even though I do not like to compare OS, the Linux driver seems to have n= o=20 problems, seeing the drive as UDMA100 So I am very stunned as what to is wrong. Since I am a BSD bewbie, I am sure it is my fault Thanks again -d To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message