From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 22 21:27:47 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB549106564A for ; Sat, 22 Nov 2008 21:27:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from mail.potentialtech.com (internet.potentialtech.com [66.167.251.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA6BC8FC17 for ; Sat, 22 Nov 2008 21:27:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from localhost (pool-72-95-226-5.pitbpa.ftas.verizon.net [72.95.226.5]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 93F9DEBC3F; Sat, 22 Nov 2008 16:27:46 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 16:30:24 -0500 From: Bill Moran To: "Kelly Jones" Message-Id: <20081122163024.fa422346.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <26face530811221316y5be5bf40ra5c38f389f554ca1@mail.gmail.com> References: <26face530811221316y5be5bf40ra5c38f389f554ca1@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.8 (GTK+ 2.12.9; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Unix program that sends email directly using MX record X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 21:27:47 -0000 On Sat, 22 Nov 2008 14:16:56 -0700 "Kelly Jones" wrote: > What Unix program sends email directly, using the MX record of the > recipient, instead of using sendmail or an installed MTA? > > I realize I could tweak sendmail.cf/etc to do this, but that's not > working in my (fairly unusual) special situation. > > I also realize that sending email directly is normally "bad", but I'm > testing something. See if ssmtp in ports does what you need. If that's still not direct enough, there's always telnet. SMTP conversations aren't really that difficult to simulate. -Bill