From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Jan 2 16:40:51 1996 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id QAA23440 for questions-outgoing; Tue, 2 Jan 1996 16:40:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from phaeton.artisoft.com (phaeton.Artisoft.COM [198.17.250.211]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id QAA23433 for ; Tue, 2 Jan 1996 16:40:46 -0800 (PST) Received: (from terry@localhost) by phaeton.artisoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id RAA13203; Tue, 2 Jan 1996 17:30:46 -0700 From: Terry Lambert Message-Id: <199601030030.RAA13203@phaeton.artisoft.com> Subject: Re: Can FreeBSD be visible from Win95? To: dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu Date: Tue, 2 Jan 1996 17:30:45 -0700 (MST) Cc: binhdo@cs.ubc.ca, questions@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: from "Doug White" at Jan 2, 96 01:48:37 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > > As I have both Win95 and FreeBSD and as I specified /win95 as a > > mount partition of FreeBSD I can access Win95 from within FreeBSD. > > But is there any way to view FreeBSD from within Win95? Thank you > > for the information. > > No. Windows 95 does not support the Unix filesystem. Well. It goes to internal Alpha on the 12th. 8-). But in order to support short file names, the on disk directory structure had to change... 8-(. But the new devfs should allow it to be auto-recognized. 8-). But there's no code to do that yet. 8-(. [ ... ] > Besides, Windows 95 does not like > anything messing with the FAT and not the VFAT. It doesn't bitch too loudly. See "Unauthorized Windows 95" by Schulman.