From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 8 14:06:43 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEBD9106566C for ; Sun, 8 Mar 2009 14:06:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gabor@FreeBSD.org) Received: from server.mypc.hu (server.mypc.hu [87.229.73.95]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78C9A8FC15 for ; Sun, 8 Mar 2009 14:06:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gabor@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by server.mypc.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0982414D785F; Sun, 8 Mar 2009 14:48:04 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at t-hosting.hu Received: from server.mypc.hu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (server.mypc.hu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id n+GmDWe9k7Z6; Sun, 8 Mar 2009 14:48:03 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.1.105] (catv-80-98-231-64.catv.broadband.hu [80.98.231.64]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by server.mypc.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3F14F14D7728; Sun, 8 Mar 2009 14:48:03 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <49B3CC91.3060107@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 08 Mar 2009 14:48:01 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=E1bor_K=F6vesd=E1n?= User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: obrien@freebsd.org References: <20090308091517.GA3604@dragon.NUXI.org> In-Reply-To: <20090308091517.GA3604@dragon.NUXI.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] upgrade shells/bash to version 4.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Mar 2009 14:06:44 -0000 David O'Brien escribió: > I need to get shells/bash repocopied before I can commit this. > But I wanted to let folks play with the upgrade if they wanted to. > I suggest using single distfile for both ones. I see that using this PATCHLEVEL method seems easier to handle when updating, but the other way isn't more diffcult either, you can just modify PORTVERSION and run make makesum. The point is that those patches are small but they can seriously prolong the fetching phase of the build due the enormous number of FTP transactions. Regards, -- Gabor Kovesdan FreeBSD Volunteer EMAIL: gabor@FreeBSD.org .:|:. gabor@kovesdan.org WEB: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~gabor .:|:. http://kovesdan.org