From owner-freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Nov  6 23:27:25 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90504106566B;
	Sun,  6 Nov 2011 23:27:25 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-vw0-f54.google.com (mail-vw0-f54.google.com
	[209.85.212.54])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D5258FC0A;
	Sun,  6 Nov 2011 23:27:25 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by vws11 with SMTP id 11so695088vws.13
	for <multiple recipients>; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 15:27:24 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
	:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
	bh=kobsCizf5Mlp1VuN6juLyAcXfg6q5UxMj03yKQLpjqo=;
	b=pBPo9zkyrEyoOubmzEAtKpzo13f0X/vro5RIz6+8ZqFNRHZSjsgGHFoIaPiq48h6uj
	twRn5IHS3Bo7rIESiCWJINyg0vApnnoAynzgClsKpLZTI+bROJKgkRHh1jdf6VJijGS4
	WzdFxGILx3wmopQAkRYNSeVwqwur3ACn+tork=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.52.76.69 with SMTP id i5mr24250397vdw.4.1320622044744; Sun, 06
	Nov 2011 15:27:24 -0800 (PST)
Sender: adrian.chadd@gmail.com
Received: by 10.52.29.198 with HTTP; Sun, 6 Nov 2011 15:27:24 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <2230529.Gp80hNdgYq@snifi>
References: <CAJ-VmomPuBs_51-X8Pin4MPtek507EUe5yjJbKhv906FtHAMZg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJ-VmonNPmLcCQGHHQkix0-a2X70LSUng9gXMqWikM1A8yQ_sg@mail.gmail.com>
	<939228459.20111106231805@serebryakov.spb.ru>
	<2230529.Gp80hNdgYq@snifi>
Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2011 15:27:24 -0800
X-Google-Sender-Auth: sTn-NB1WelzCpINHJPVdnmsSseA
Message-ID: <CAJ-Vmonu+u61TxXUPdVBq8B4-9qec06LeVpAKi5PS_9kEMHE3w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>
To: Maciej Milewski <milu@dat.pl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cc: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: update - new hal flag to force a full chip reset
X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussions of 802.11 stack,
	tools device driver development." <freebsd-wireless.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-wireless-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-wireless>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-wireless-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-wireless-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2011 23:27:25 -0000

Just stick with the AR9220/AR9280 NICs. I have to fix this stuff,
right? So unless you absolutely, positively require stuff right now
(and if you do, grab an AR9160), stick with the AR9220/AR9280.

The AR9220/AR9280 in 5ghz mode works just fine in my testing.

I haven't (re) tested the AR9285/AR9287 in congested 2.4ghz mode. I'll
try to do that this week.



Adrian