From owner-freebsd-chat Wed May 5 9:20:28 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from melete.ch.intel.com (melete.ch.intel.com [143.182.246.25]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3083C15201 for ; Wed, 5 May 1999 09:20:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jreynold@sedona.ch.intel.com) Received: from sedona.intel.com (sedona.ch.intel.com [143.182.218.21]) by melete.ch.intel.com (8.9.1a+p1/8.9.1/d: relay.m4,v 1.6 1998/11/24 22:10:56 iwep Exp iwep $) with ESMTP id JAA01897; Wed, 5 May 1999 09:20:21 -0700 (MST) Received: from hip186.ch.intel.com (hip186.ch.intel.com [143.182.225.68]) by sedona.intel.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1/d: sendmail.cf,v 1.8 1999/04/16 15:25:49 steved Exp steved $) with ESMTP id JAA05001; Wed, 5 May 1999 09:20:22 -0700 (MST) X-Envelope-From: jreynold@sedona.ch.intel.com Received: (from jreynold@localhost) by hip186.ch.intel.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1/d: client.m4,v 1.3 1998/09/29 16:36:11 sedayao Exp sedayao $) id MAA13879; Wed, 5 May 1999 12:20:21 -0400 (EDT) From: John Reynolds~ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <14128.28612.595577.421402@hip186.ch.intel.com> Date: Wed, 5 May 1999 09:20:20 -0700 (MST) To: jmutter@netwalk.com Cc: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Mindcruft ... In-Reply-To: References: <14128.25013.222841.381373@hip186.ch.intel.com> X-Mailer: VM 6.70 under Emacs 19.34.1 Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org [ On Wednesday, May 5, James A. Mutter wrote: ] > > Well, someone asked this a few days ago and the general response was > that Mindcraft's reputation was rather tainted at the moment. It > would be nice though to see a test, formal or informal, of FreeBSD > 3.X, Linux (Whatever is the latest stable kernel), and NT 4.0 all > tuned by a professional on the same hardware, same situation, etc... > Generally, a fair test on a level playing field. I definitely agree. All that URL did was talk about Linux, linux, linux. Linux this and Linux that ... I'm quite sure that FreeBSD could hold its own against Linux on the same hardware. It would sure be cool to be able to steal some of the PR on this. And, if by some chance, we didn't score as well as we needed to, we could use that as constructive criticism and go work on those areas (since we seem to have the goal to be the "server of choice" and this benchmark was server stuff ... not how well Office clones or WindowMaker work to take over world domination from M$). -Jr -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= | John Reynolds CEG, CCE, Next Generation Flows, HLA | | Intel Corporation MS: CH6-210 Phone: 480-554-9092 pgr: 868-6512 | | jreynold@sedona.ch.intel.com http://www-aec.ch.intel.com/~jreynold/ | =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message