From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 10 02:26:57 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40951F2A for ; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 02:26:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23EEA1826 for ; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 02:26:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from Alfreds-MacBook-Pro.local (50-204-88-5-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [50.204.88.5]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B67231A3C28; Mon, 9 Dec 2013 18:26:49 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <52A67BE8.9050509@mu.org> Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2013 18:26:48 -0800 From: Alfred Perlstein User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel O'Connor Subject: Re: BIND segway -> python -> first-class ports References: <529E8C53.6020208@freebsd.org> <20131204060246.GV2951@home.opsec.eu> <52A12843.3010204@freebsd.org> <0BFC927B-D72E-4926-BB3D-2C000F310BDD@fisglobal.com> <7271C4C4-7BAB-4DA7-9E10-49D5B2DB8964@mu.org> <52A51438.4090200@bluerosetech.com> <8D54491D-5A1C-4D30-AD48-12336D0726DC@gsoft.com.au> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Stable" X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 02:26:57 -0000 On 12/9/13, 2:11 PM, Daniel O'Connor wrote: > On 9 Dec 2013, at 22:21, Alfred Perlstein wrote: >>> On Dec 8, 2013, at 9:13 PM, "Daniel O'Connor" wrote: >>> >>> (I don't care if it's JSON, XML or smoke signals just so long as it isn't hideously slow). >>> >> You have described exactly what we are trying to accomplish. Thank you! > OK, great, can you have an implementation by COB Friday? :) > > Although seriously, I do wonder what the best way to implement it would be. > > I can imagine modifying /bin/sh to have such a feature would be somewhat controversial.. > A few interesting targets would be sysctl, ifconfig, gpart, disklabel, ... any others? -Alfred