From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Jun 4 9:30:55 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from relay.nuxi.com (nuxi.cs.ucdavis.edu [169.237.7.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59C5837B401; Mon, 4 Jun 2001 09:30:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien@nuxi.ucdavis.edu) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (root@trang.nuxi.com [206.40.252.115]) by relay.nuxi.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f54GUZl94262; Mon, 4 Jun 2001 09:30:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.11.3/8.11.1) id f54GUTq85037; Mon, 4 Jun 2001 09:30:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2001 09:30:25 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" To: Anders Nordby , Sheldon Hearn , Mike Meyer , Maxim Sobolev , andreas@FreeBSD.ORG, eric@cybernut.com, ijliao@FreeBSD.ORG, jdp@FreeBSD.ORG, jdp@polstra.com, jmz@FreeBSD.ORG, jseger@FreeBSD.ORG, keith@FreeBSD.ORG, knu@FreeBSD.ORG, lioux@FreeBSD.ORG, matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org, mi@aldan.algebra.com, nectar@FreeBSD.ORG, nobutaka@nobutaka.com, ozz@FreeBSD.org.ru, sam@inf.enst.fr, shige@FreeBSD.ORG, trevor@FreeBSD.ORG, yatt@msc.biglobe.ne.jp, ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: WITHOUT_X vs. WITHOUT_X11 vs. NO_X Message-ID: <20010604093025.A84595@dragon.nuxi.com> Reply-To: obrien@FreeBSD.ORG References: <15127.62143.888966.869172@guru.mired.org> <7782.991637382@axl.seasidesoftware.co.za> <20010604131416.A90338@totem.fix.no> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010604131416.A90338@totem.fix.no>; from anders@fix.no on Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 01:14:17PM +0200 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 01:14:17PM +0200, Anders Nordby wrote: > I disagree. I think X11 better identifies what we are disabling support > for than just X. X can be anything. Then NO_X in the base system is bad? > WITHOUT_X11 was also the consensus last time the discussion was on > -ports, and I think -doc folks should adhere to that. It isn't what "the -doc folks should adhear to". I am looking for an excutive decision from on high (ie, portmgr). I will personally change make.conf.5 as soon as they declare what it shall be. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message