From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 4 21:26:36 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAB5216A41F for ; Fri, 4 Nov 2005 21:26:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6278443D48 for ; Fri, 4 Nov 2005 21:26:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id jA4LSsb60820; Fri, 4 Nov 2005 13:28:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Steve Bertrand" , , Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2005 13:26:02 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1250" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <20051103152751.C48FC43D49@mx1.FreeBSD.org> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 Importance: Normal Cc: Subject: RE: gmirror on 1 or 2 IDE cables X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2005 21:26:36 -0000 >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Steve Bertrand >Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2005 7:28 AM >To: gayn.winters@bristolsystems.com; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >Subject: RE: gmirror on 1 or 2 IDE cables > > > >> Using gmirror to mirror two identical drives, how much of a >> performance hit is it to have >> >> 1. Both drives on one IDE cable? >> Compared to: >> 2. One drive primary on one cable and one secondary on the >> other cable? >> Compared to: >> 3. Both drives primary but on separate IDE cables? > >My understanding that only a single drive on each IDE channel can be >accessed at any one time. > Which may or may not matter depending on what he's doing. Are we talking mainly reads or writes here? Ted