From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Jan  9 21:45:08 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCD73106564A
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Mon,  9 Jan 2012 21:45:08 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from alexkozlov0@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-ee0-f54.google.com (mail-ee0-f54.google.com [74.125.83.54])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FB108FC13
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Mon,  9 Jan 2012 21:45:07 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by eekc50 with SMTP id c50so2959865eek.13
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Mon, 09 Jan 2012 13:45:07 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mime-version:content-type
	:content-disposition;
	bh=/rYHqOx/V4d86eV4BS2OGnGeeZzNCrfumVKIzl6/cvc=;
	b=vSxWgnqEAttcX3dltXZizp9br6lMqUOJZ+jTk0UsI9l0a4URd53+v1OQgsQx8R7dAg
	LUUdff81yjLDqkox/LqszT4Vt8N0Js/FiJY2vX5ysuuxzPKMyRdYptILX2JxNeY5pXV6
	LJIWCOouhcbN46n2+Sb9qjspc9hT075uHREcA=
Received: by 10.213.114.84 with SMTP id d20mr1944971ebq.100.1326144123103;
	Mon, 09 Jan 2012 13:22:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ravenloft.kiev.ua (ravenloft.kiev.ua. [94.244.131.95])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 15sm44613044eeu.1.2012.01.09.13.21.59
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
	Mon, 09 Jan 2012 13:22:01 -0800 (PST)
Sender: Alex Kozlov <alexkozlov0@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2012 23:21:28 +0200
From: Alex Kozlov <spam@rm-rf.kiev.ua>
To: ports@freebsd.org, spam@rm-rf.kiev.ua
Message-ID: <20120109212128.GA53155@ravenloft.kiev.ua>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Cc: 
Subject: Re: archivers/zip in 9.x:
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2012 21:45:08 -0000

On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 01:06:04AM +0400, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
> Michael Scheidell wrote on 10.01.2012 00:30:
>> I think I saw something in the list that FreeBSD 9.x has zip already
>> built in? so, ports that need 'zip' won't need zip?
>>
>> for maintainers, they should use something like:
>>
>> USE_ZIP= yes
>>
>> to:
>>
>> if ${OSVERSION} <= 900000
>> USE_ZIP= yes
>> .endif
>>
>> and/or BUILD_DEPENDS+= zip:${PORTSDIR}/archivers/zip
>>
>> (at what OSVERSION was zip included in the base?)
> unzip, not zip. I believe it should be handled in bsd.port.mk like it
> done for USE_XZ. Something like:
>
> .if defined(USE_ZIP) && ${OSVERSION} < 900000
> EXTRACT_DEPENDS+=       ${LOCALBASE}/bin/unzip:${PORTSDIR}/archivers/unzip
> .endif
>
> Correct OSVERSION should be used instead of 900000. There is also should
> be some logic for UNZIP_CMD.
A few things need to be done before it will be possible to use the
native unzip in CURRENT:
1) pr153429
2) mfv libarchive's seekable zip reader
3) patch to bsd.port.mk which implements USE_ZIP = yes|native|infozip
4) few tinderbox runs


--
Adios