From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Jan 17 0:45:51 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from exchange.prism.co.za (exchange.prism.co.za [196.34.63.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D53414E05 for ; Mon, 17 Jan 2000 00:45:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from alwyns@littlecruncher.prizm.dhs.org) Received: from littlecruncher.prizm.dhs.org (196.34.63.201 [196.34.63.201]) by exchange.prism.co.za with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2448.0) id C6S5Z1QW; Mon, 17 Jan 2000 10:47:50 +0200 Received: by littlecruncher.prizm.dhs.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 449C9BC; Mon, 17 Jan 2000 10:46:24 +0200 (SAST) Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2000 10:46:24 +0200 From: Alwyn Schoeman To: Alex Charalabidis Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: NetWare/BorderManager vs FreeBSD/squid Message-ID: <20000117104623.A6614@littlecruncher.prizm.dhs.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: ; from alex@wnm.net on Thu, Jan 13, 2000 at 03:40:17PM -0600 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, 1) Novell BorderManager is based on Squid or was in the beginning. 2) It gets an additional boost because Novell is really a big caching OS. Everything is cached left right and center. 3) If the company uses NDS for user login then Bordermanager will allow you to do access control via NDS. I myself would use squid if price was an issue and if it would be the only Novell server in the environment, otherwise I would go BorderManager. Novell environments are a lot more pleasurable than MS ones :) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message