From owner-freebsd-arch Mon Nov 5 9: 1:32 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from c527597-a.cstvl1.sfba.home.com (c527597-a.cstvl1.sfba.home.com [24.176.204.87]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5B9637B405; Mon, 5 Nov 2001 09:01:26 -0800 (PST) Received: (from bmah@localhost) by c527597-a.cstvl1.sfba.home.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id fA5H1OU09029; Mon, 5 Nov 2001 09:01:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bmah) Message-Id: <200111051701.fA5H1OU09029@c527597-a.cstvl1.sfba.home.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 To: Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai Cc: "Bruce A. Mah" , freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: One True Awk licensing In-Reply-To: <20011105124550.N83053@daemon.ninth-circle.org> References: <200111050201.fA5210404370@c527597-a.cstvl1.sfba.home.com> <20011105124550.N83053@daemon.ninth-circle.org> Comments: In-reply-to Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai message dated "Mon, 05 Nov 2001 12:45:50 +0100." From: "Bruce A. Mah" Reply-To: bmah@FreeBSD.ORG X-Face: g~c`.{#4q0"(V*b#g[i~rXgm*w;:nMfz%_RZLma)UgGN&=j`5vXoU^@n5v4:OO)c["!w)nD/!!~e4Sj7LiT'6*wZ83454H""lb{CC%T37O!!'S$S&D}sem7I[A 2V%N&+ X-Image-Url: http://www.employees.org/~bmah/Images/bmah-cisco-small.gif X-Url: http://www.employees.org/~bmah/ Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_-1962897152P"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2001 09:01:24 -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --==_Exmh_-1962897152P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii If memory serves me right, Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai wrote: > -On [20011105 03:30], Bruce A. Mah (bmah@freebsd.org) wrote: > >bwk wanted us to let him know if we decide to use it, because he has a > >few minor code fixes (no feature changes) he'd like us to take too. > > > >(This all happened before we ran into the problem with needing POSIX.1 > >character class support, and DES's subsequent patch to incorporate this > >feature.) > > So we can become/are becoming/are willing to become the bwk maintainers? > Personally it would be cool to do so. Ummm...if you're suggesting that the FreeBSD developers would become the "official" maintainers of 1TAwk, no, neither bwk nor I were suggesting any such thing. All I meant was that bwk had some patches that he'd made to 1TAwk that weren't in the sharball on Web page, and that he'd pass them to us. Bruce. --==_Exmh_-1962897152P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: Exmh version 2.3.1+ 05/14/2001 iD4DBQE75sXk2MoxcVugUsMRAhWUAKD17atvuoSDkzOimHAoytLzuvz1vgCYgwLz oSBSLYALThbdW/vBmK0SjQ== =t4ps -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_-1962897152P-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message