From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Sep 18 08:40:09 2010
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 283831065672
	for <freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org>;
	Sat, 18 Sep 2010 08:40:09 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org
	[IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0F828FC0C
	for <freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org>;
	Sat, 18 Sep 2010 08:40:08 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o8I8e8ub010941
	for <freebsd-ports-bugs@freefall.freebsd.org>;
	Sat, 18 Sep 2010 08:40:08 GMT
	(envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org)
Received: (from gnats@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id o8I8e8xH010934;
	Sat, 18 Sep 2010 08:40:08 GMT (envelope-from gnats)
Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2010 08:40:08 GMT
Message-Id: <201009180840.o8I8e8xH010934@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
From: Anonymous <swell.k@gmail.com>
Cc: 
Subject: Re: ports/150604: [PATCH] sysutils/superiotool: Fix build with
	alternate LOCALBASE
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Anonymous <swell.k@gmail.com>
List-Id: Ports bug reports <freebsd-ports-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-bugs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2010 08:40:09 -0000

The following reply was made to PR ports/150604; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Anonymous <swell.k@gmail.com>
To: Andriy Gapon <avg@icyb.net.ua>
Cc: Tim Bishop <tim@bishnet.net>,  bug-followup@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: ports/150604: [PATCH] sysutils/superiotool: Fix build with alternate LOCALBASE
Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2010 12:29:02 +0400

 Andriy Gapon <avg@icyb.net.ua> writes:
 
 > Guys,
 >
 > if you need that functionality and you tested the patches and they work, then I
 > approve.
 
 Well, I do need the port to respect CC[1] and CFLAGS[2] because I use
 gcc45 and build all my ports with debug symbols, sometimes with -O0.
 
 The tool's output doesn't seem to change after applying my diff.
 But I don't really use the port.
 
 [1] http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/porters-handbook/dads-cc.html
 [2] http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/porters-handbook/dads-cflags.html
 
 > Tim's patch is simple enough for me to see through it, but Anonymous' patch
 > seems to be more comprehensive.  If changing '=' to '?=' makes the build really
 > honor values set by port's Makefile, then this change seems to be preferable.
 
 Nah, there is little difference between hardcoding value into Makefile
 by REINPLACE_CMD and using `?='.