From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 30 16:59:09 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6519A16A4CE for ; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 16:59:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from sarevok.webteckies.org (node123e0.a2000.nl [24.132.35.224]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 132B343D3F for ; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 16:59:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mdev@sarevok.webteckies.org) Received: by sarevok.webteckies.org (Postfix, from userid 100) id 2FE04B82A; Sat, 31 Jan 2004 01:59:07 +0100 (CET) From: Melvyn Sopacua Organization: WebTeckies.org To: Edmund Craske , Free BSD Questions list Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 01:59:06 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.94 References: <16410.32120.8050.315995@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <002701c3e751$681c53c0$0464a8c0@alpha> <20040130193155.GA27927@teddy.fas.com> In-Reply-To: <20040130193155.GA27927@teddy.fas.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Boundary-02=_b3vGARclR1qhj/c"; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200401310159.07012.freebsd-questions@webteckies.org> Subject: Re: Using bind9, instead of the default bind8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 00:59:09 -0000 --Boundary-02=_b3vGARclR1qhj/c Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Friday 30 January 2004 20:31, stan wrote: > On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 04:52:12PM -0000, Edmund Craske wrote: > > There's something wrong with the rc.conf stuff for named if you install > > the bind9 port over the base bind8 (by doing a make > > -DPORT_REPLACES_BASE_BIND9 install clean in dns/bind9) because of > > differences in command line arguments. Of course, you could just work it > > out and hash it together, or leave the base bind8 alone entirely and > > install bind9 as a separate port... It doesn't really matter either way, > > just make sure you're executing the bind9 named instead of the bind8 on= e. > > Thnaks for the advice. > > I found the startup flags issue. it's as simple as not needing the "-g > bind". Only the -u bind is allowd. > > I suppose I should make an effort to run this chrooted. Given that I did > specify the DPORT_REPLACES_BASE_BIND9 optin, would the correct palce tp > chroot be /etc/namedb? I've got a patch for this for -CURRENT (rcng), filed it at: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3D61647 =2D-=20 Melvyn =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =46reeBSD sarevok.webteckies.org 5.2-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT #0: Wed Ja= n 28=20 18:01:18 CET 2004 =20 root@sarevok.lan.webteckies.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SAREVOK_NOAPM_NODEBUG = =20 i386 =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D --Boundary-02=_b3vGARclR1qhj/c Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBAGv3aOv9JNmfFN5URAvnpAJ9dv9+Tetz4LpyDmHnZpGz73OLcpQCZAenm HqRJitmeziV0ajZya0sLAjQ= =Bxdv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Boundary-02=_b3vGARclR1qhj/c--