From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jan  4 16:35:46 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47C34106564A
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Tue,  4 Jan 2011 16:35:46 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from fluffy@fluffy.khv.ru)
Received: from forward12.mail.yandex.net (forward12.mail.yandex.net
	[95.108.130.94])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B5BB8FC1D
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Tue,  4 Jan 2011 16:35:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from web155.yandex.ru (web155.yandex.ru [95.108.131.168])
	by forward12.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 429262210F14;
	Tue,  4 Jan 2011 19:35:34 +0300 (MSK)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by web155.yandex.ru (Yandex) with ESMTP id 33C926EA0295;
	Tue,  4 Jan 2011 19:35:34 +0300 (MSK)
Received: from [46.38.1.85] ([46.38.1.85]) by mail.yandex.ru with HTTP;
	Tue, 04 Jan 2011 19:35:33 +0300
From: Dima Panov <fluffy@fluffy.khv.ru>
To: Kurt Jaeger <lists@opsec.eu>
In-Reply-To: <20110104162757.GT34314@home.opsec.eu>
References: <201101041437.08402.david@vizion2000.net>
	<4D233619.1000305@DataIX.net> <289781294155870@web149.yandex.ru>
	<20110104162757.GT34314@home.opsec.eu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <251591294158933@web155.yandex.ru>
Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2011 02:35:33 +1000
X-Mailer: Yamail [ http://yandex.ru ] 5.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: diablo-jdk- misses libodbcinst.so & conflicts libiodbc/virtuoso
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2011 16:35:46 -0000

Hello!

05.01.2011, 02:27, "Kurt Jaeger" <lists@opsec.eu>:
> Hi!
>
> Dima Panov write:
>
>> šjhell@dataix.net wrote:
>>> šReplace libiodbc with unixODBC
>>>
>>> šThey provide the same layer that virtuoso would need for ODBC.
>> šNope. unixODBC provide outdated API and lacks of some features,
>> šexist in libiodbc and required by virtuoso.
>
> Ah, interesting. What's the difference ? 

Sorry, I'm not an odbc profi to provide a correct answer,
please search in virtuoso mailinglists, reasons was published AFAIR before switching to libiodbc.

> So a drive to  replace unixODBC in every port would be more useful ?

yes. anyway, unixODBC was staled some time ago, and now no reasons to continue support  it

qt4/kde4 was switched to libiodbc some months ago.

-- 
Dima Panov (fluffy@FreeBSD.org)
KDE@FreeBSD team

Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/?id=100000181104157