From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 14 18:25:00 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3DB937E for ; Mon, 14 Oct 2013 18:25:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sdb@ssr.com) Received: from mailhost.ssr.com (mailhost.ssr.com [199.4.235.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 79DD82CBF for ; Mon, 14 Oct 2013 18:25:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 7256 invoked from network); 14 Oct 2013 19:17:14 -0000 Received: from pool-71-167-229-74.nycmny.east.verizon.net (HELO irelay.ssr.com) (sdb@71.167.229.74) by 199.4.235.5 with SMTP; 14 Oct 2013 19:17:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 58155 invoked by uid 103); 14 Oct 2013 17:48:33 -0000 Date: 14 Oct 2013 17:48:33 -0000 Message-ID: <20131014174833.58154.qmail@irelay.ssr.com> From: Scott Ballantyne To: Warren Block In-reply-to: (message from Warren Block on Sun, 13 Oct 2013 23:03:13 -0600 (MDT)) Subject: Re: Advice sought on Portmaster -Faf and deleted ports References: <20131013200236.7874.qmail@irelay.ssr.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2013 18:25:00 -0000 > > > Hi, > > > > I'm following the recipe at the end of man portmaster for deleting and > > reinstalling all my ports, which I have done many times in the > > past. This time, I am getting errors on the portmaster -Faf step > > involving deleted ports, and I'm not sure how to deal with this > > easily. > > What errors, exactly? Well, for example: portmaster -Faf it starts to fetch a bunch of files it finds a port which has been deleted, such as linux-base-fc4 and it says, "linux-base-fc4" has been deleted. terminating terminating terminating etc. > > > So, I am seeking expert advice here. Is there a way to automate this > > and keep myself out of trouble, or do I need to do a 'port-by-port' > > upgrade of each port? > > It should "just work". Have you converted to pkgng? > I dream of the day that the ports system will "just work". I don't use binary packages, are you saying that pkgng will deal with this issue automatically? Thanks, Scott