From owner-freebsd-scsi Sun Jun 21 16:21:35 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id QAA23759 for freebsd-scsi-outgoing; Sun, 21 Jun 1998 16:21:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from cabri.obs-besancon.fr (cabri.obs-besancon.fr [193.52.184.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id QAA23721 for ; Sun, 21 Jun 1998 16:21:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jmz@cabri.obs-besancon.fr) Received: by cabri.obs-besancon.fr (5.57/Ultrix3.0-C) id AA10744; Mon, 22 Jun 98 01:25:02 +0200 Date: Mon, 22 Jun 98 01:25:02 +0200 Message-Id: <9806212325.AA10744@cabri.obs-besancon.fr> From: Jean-Marc Zucconi To: ken@plutotech.com Cc: freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <199806191730.LAA12458@panzer.plutotech.com> (ken@plutotech.com) Subject: Re: Rolling CAM in, what is still needed? X-Mailer: Emacs Sender: owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org >>>>> Kenneth D Merry writes: > Right, that's what I'm interested in. I talked to Julian this > morning (in person, actually!) and that's the question I had. So I'll say > it so everyone can see: > - How many more programs use this (scsireq) interface? /usr/ports/sysutils/cd-write/ > - Are people going to yell and scream loudly if it goes away when CAM > is integrated into the tree?? Not if the new interface is well documented ;-) Jean-Marc _____________________________________________________________________________ Jean-Marc Zucconi Observatoire de Besancon F 25010 Besancon cedex PGP Key: finger jmz@cabri.obs-besancon.fr To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-scsi" in the body of the message