From owner-freebsd-testing@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jul 23 02:54:28 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-testing@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9595ACD9;
 Tue, 23 Jul 2013 02:54:28 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from yaneurabeya@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-ve0-x230.google.com (mail-ve0-x230.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c01::230])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4533020EC;
 Tue, 23 Jul 2013 02:54:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-ve0-f176.google.com with SMTP id c13so5690859vea.35
 for <multiple recipients>; Mon, 22 Jul 2013 19:54:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
 :cc:content-type;
 bh=XglNCTmGWP+YmLgMdjBFz9pwnc8OjWs87vMzR4Uj9oo=;
 b=zmstgpIr5rHJ4rp2WUXu2xCgMd69lidY/+zd/6T38kXMiYAjQLvQWVJRwvVTyiinJK
 /x98CuAS+d6CcP6KOJnupc/WG71YLsyCpVvgIVSi/v6sZwFDgNE0Cg0VUsC6iq6c38wo
 YmtKzIRUXQwLYegSLKvPxPgXtqo59GbFWdkV9ndxBPLehWSLwHRtIxbsTsy9YPuKwIjg
 77N/bIhcRISOglQEGC2U6hyIvbwlpOvQWMoZc9ZOu8w5iv3fgke7XDIpRpuZlsEuzG7e
 MOIG4i2cF0BxODaJsInrZYkqTc/RLSgTvsbuC+bHXzY5yUQAPnRRnB34Zsww48EXp3+z
 9b+Q==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.58.128.71 with SMTP id nm7mr10233048veb.51.1374548065924;
 Mon, 22 Jul 2013 19:54:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.220.146.145 with HTTP; Mon, 22 Jul 2013 19:54:25 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAGHfRMBQRQswNecOzXK0Cxh6=m4pKXOZ1Pwhg82SMdOc-E+PyA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20130719200017.GA79155@mastodon.meroh.net>
 <CAGHfRMC9xV6QRBieQp-kJW1OMqXgqDmhjQ3DGPQTJ2Swg3B3+Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <CADyfeQX27p5G9eeOFcxzN1iuNnerqFFumB9---HL2tYdwfNkrQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAGHfRMAHMmeBkrURko7RO87p2wBKYvo9cAP7s6h0qOUJnbyfAg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CADyfeQUAcbSLNWVzP24WEgsnt4Qqf9Ge--aD6LwakmBj5zjgFQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <8D6EC091-EA47-4B0F-B270-429C596FAF52@gmail.com>
 <CAOtMX2iUjta0v5BzLfdtV6X8wHrC_-+u1ve5v9nQ-c-eLD-g9A@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAGHfRMBQRQswNecOzXK0Cxh6=m4pKXOZ1Pwhg82SMdOc-E+PyA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 19:54:25 -0700
Message-ID: <CAGHfRMBw2AA_Qg6miMN8G5gP=-x1APhfojr5bZ-yBkGopxeaUw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Getting rid of the ATF tools
From: Garrett Cooper <yaneurabeya@gmail.com>
To: Alan Somers <asomers@freebsd.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cc: Julio Merino <julio@meroh.net>,
 "freebsd-testing@freebsd.org" <freebsd-testing@freebsd.org>,
 Rui Paulo <rpaulo@netbsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Testing on FreeBSD <freebsd-testing.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-testing>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-testing-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-testing>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-testing@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-testing-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-testing>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-testing-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 02:54:28 -0000

On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 1:15 PM, Garrett Cooper <yaneurabeya@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 12:54 PM, Alan Somers <asomers@freebsd.org> wrote:
>> Speaking of backporting, has anybody yet merged Garrett's git branch
>> to a stable/9 based branch?  We're still basing our bsd.test.mk etc
>> off of a very old branch of Garrett's.
>>
>> (sorry for double post; I sent the last post from the wrong email
>> alias so the message didn't get accepted by mailman)
>
> No one has yet. And speaking of backporting, now the test
> infrastructure will allow you to build and install tests without bmake
> if you apply this commit:
>
> https://github.com/yaneurabeya/freebsd/commit/79d9a53836dcf8127d17c35705dd8c79b040fc04
>
> This is what I'm going to push into OneFS and is what should get
> pushed into FreeBSD as well.

I'll pull back things to stable/9. I have one box at home that I can
use for this effort (it's running stable/9). It would be curious to
see how 9.2-BETA1 fares compared to 10.0-CURRENT anyhoo...
Thanks!
-Garrett