From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 3 20:28:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23D4216A407 for ; Mon, 3 Jul 2006 20:28:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-ports@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80D2B43D53 for ; Mon, 3 Jul 2006 20:28:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-ports@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1FxV1r-0004Rn-8Y for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Mon, 03 Jul 2006 22:28:23 +0200 Received: from p548fd24b.dip.t-dialin.net ([84.143.210.75]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 03 Jul 2006 22:28:23 +0200 Received: from rotkap by p548fd24b.dip.t-dialin.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 03 Jul 2006 22:28:23 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: Heino Tiedemann Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2006 22:28:02 +0200 Organization: yes Lines: 16 Message-ID: References: <449DE614.3040204@spamcop.net> <449F43EF.6030107@spamcop.net> <200607011444.36821.david.marec@free.fr> <44A97652.7070003@freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: p548fd24b.dip.t-dialin.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) XEmacs/21.4.19 (berkeley-unix) X-Face: v6Lci{Mw=kwHf$`7C?L-U#BHn7O\wqF-1qg#Vk%}nUQv\i^mM/.p=wU+cr)yXf#Ob+foOOxW; ir"QI!|25wG3`ywF)yh~@V.kKtr.qp+v.R; w?c@ZzM#!'/7r_+)$NjMN:]qo-]`&z~KlP}|cERO'%s9":6\ZnN/O Subject: Re: print/cups-base 1.2.0_2 and locally connected printer X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: rotkap@gmx.de List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2006 20:28:33 -0000 "Bruce A. Mah" wrote: > If memory serves me right, David MAREC wrote: >> Is there new device policies defined by cups ? >> > I noticed that the cups port now installs a cups user and group. I > infer from that change that some portion of cups now runs as a > non-privileged user, and that if you're driving a parallel port, it > needs to writable (readable too?) by the new cups user. > > (I encountered this problem on my RELENG_6/i386 print server machine, > made /dev/lpt0 owned by cups:cups, and it worked. root:cups is also workig (rw-rw----). Heino