From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 22 23:22:15 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72042106566B; Sun, 22 Jul 2012 23:22:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from makc@freebsd.org) Received: from mail.issp.ac.ru (mail.issp.ac.ru [77.236.34.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0B468FC1E; Sun, 22 Jul 2012 23:22:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dev016-105.eduroam.manchester.ac.uk [194.66.16.105:59022] (HELO/EHLO mercury.ph.man.ac.uk, authenticated with LOGIN) by mail.issp.ac.ru with ESMTP/inet id q6MNM758082133 (using TLSv1/SSLv3, with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256 bits), verified NO) Mon, 23 Jul 2012 03:22:08 +0400 (MSK) From: Max Brazhnikov To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2012 23:22:13 +0000 Message-ID: <2733192.bb9eyUHP4H@mercury.ph.man.ac.uk> User-Agent: KMail/4.8.4 (FreeBSD/9.0-STABLE; KDE/4.8.4; amd64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: <500B8811.9090609@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Cc: Scot Hetzel , kde@freebsd.org, Jeremy Messenger , ruby@freebsd.org, Edwin Groothuis , gnome@freebsd.org, "Jason E. Hale" Subject: Re: Re: How to remove erroneous deps from pkgng X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2012 23:22:15 -0000 On Sun, 22 Jul 2012 09:51:40 -0500 Jeremy Messenger wrote: > You need to start to respect the people's work and plan, Doug. Also I > am part of team that maintaining the bsd.gnome.mk. Yes it will be > re-add if anyone plan to remove it, because I already have planned add > the :build/:run feature in the bsd.gnome.mk that the without :* will > be both build/run time dependency. in kde4.mk we support not only run/build suffixes, but also have default dependence type if suffix is not set. > The only thing that I don't plan is to chase thousands of port to have > the 'pkgconfig;build'. If anyone want to take up this task is cool > with me. Why should we change lots of ports and always keep eyes on new ports, if it can be altered once in .mk ?? Max