From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Jun 20 21:02:45 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6595716A4CE
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Sun, 20 Jun 2004 21:02:45 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from web50704.mail.yahoo.com (web50704.mail.yahoo.com
	[206.190.38.102])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F231643D2D
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Sun, 20 Jun 2004 21:02:44 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from w8hdkim@yahoo.com)
Message-ID: <20040620210244.67785.qmail@web50704.mail.yahoo.com>
Received: from [68.40.135.37] by web50704.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP;
	Sun, 20 Jun 2004 14:02:44 PDT
Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2004 14:02:44 -0700 (PDT)
From: Kim Culhan <w8hdkim@yahoo.com>
To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <200406202209.59939.max@love2party.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
cc: Max Laier <max@love2party.net>
Subject: IPSEC on -current [was: -current build failure]
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2004 21:02:45 -0000

--- Max Laier <max@love2party.net> wrote:
> On Saturday 19 June 2004 21:08, Kim Culhan wrote:

> > ../../../contrib/pf/net/pfvar.h:55: error: redefinition of `union
> > sockaddr_union'
> > *** Error code 1
> >
> > Is my build environment hosed ?
> 
> No, this is a problem when you add both:
> 	options	FAST_IPSEC
> and	device	pfsync
> 
> Attached patch is a quick-fix. I will investigate a more final
> solution. Sorry 
> for the delay.

Thats great Max, thanks muchly.

As we're on the topic, what is the -current state of IPSEC ? 

Googling the net shows lots of examples using gif devices and
running racoon.

Is this still the way to go on -current ?

If its not the most up-to-date method, any pointers to
the Right Thing are very greatly appreciated.

-kim


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com